Kamilla Czastka Painting

Music from Planet Earth – The Big Bang Effect and Its Consequences

12 years, 172 days ago

The Big Bang itself is a splitting event. Since we can observe that energy-bearing mass originates as an atom—and see that it forms a structure consisting of protons, neutrons, and electrons—it follows that the Big Bang split everything apart. All particles were completely liberated from their bonds and then formed new connections.

The Big Bang effect describes the moment directly after: state of dissolution (*a kind of nothing?)

And they do this again until they have "connected" the maximum of energy again.

The electrons are the collectors, negotiators, workers (?) of the energy.
The neutrons are the keepers (?) of the energy.
The protons are the energy. (*?)

If the entire energy is bundled again, then a 100% energy-mass would have to consist of protons.
Then, consequently, all electrons have become protons and neutrons are gone.

The neutrons have done the job and what are they now?
Are they either on the outside, displaced from the mediator-space between electrons and protons, or do they float and swirl around?
Are they waiting for further bond-less particles from "banged" mass, to follow their drive and to connect?

Or they have become a part of the energy-mass.

Since a mass possesses a density, the mass must be a single compressed energy sphere. This shape is logical, as it is most effective to center and compress everything onto one point. Possibly this compression is so strong that it then bangs. So a Big Bang would also be an always recurring cycle.

So I continue to follow the thought of how the electrons and protons connect again and the neutrons fill their existence meaningfully.
I assume that bit by bit atoms assemble again. From the first simplest connections they "pair" then to the next larger connections and so on.

Similar to a star.

So it seems logical, when the evolutionary steps from the single-cell organism to the universe man are tracked, that e.g. more proton-kept energy can do more than less.
So one could explain e.g. that a human can therefore develop their thoughts (*?) into a form of visible communication, to get easier to the energy-symmetrical partners.

( These: if the matter, which is finite because it consumes more energy for the materialization, decays, so it is possible that this share of the energy-mass - not materialized, remains and binds to the next fitting energy, so continues to exist as a share of, or it was not stable enough and decays..??* considerations :) )

( These: The brain would be a neutron, which is capable of expressing thoughts to the outside via a code. If one sees the code from 1 and 0, then it is only two characters that describe everything *?) 
The shares of the code grow with the shares of the energy carriers. The more code units, the more complex the possibility of expression for understanding. We develop our energy by shaping the possibilities for correct connections faster and more efficiently.

Since a 100% absolutely compressed energy consists of a single One, it must have divided itself justly during its decay into absolutely identical particles. 50% electron-share neutrons and 50% proton-share neutrons. Including the justly distributed (*??) magnet units.
Singularity means accordingly that the striving for singularity must displace neutrons.
Then together again, compression, bang, absolutism/nothing, and from the front the next run of the elements :) 
A Phoenix :))

---> Actually a beautiful prospect of a kind of "rebirth".
So continuing to follow my logic, a human is in their way a kind of atom. Leonardo's drawing of the human in the circle to capture his proportions and other things, likewise shows the center in the pelvis, would be my analogy to the proton here, so the head would be the electron and the sensory elements would then be the neutrons in between. Head is always in minus . Belly always wants to be in plus. Neutrons must provide balance. Since the core can only be as strong as its outermost edge of its effect, so it must supply the electron just as the electron supplies him.

Magnetic fields. The share and distribution (*??) are crucial.
The distance between electron and proton is determined by the force of attraction and the mass in between. The mass in between is the actual manipulative control-element in its development. It is for me a magic world of all possibilities. I am not yet entirely sure why it is so inventive.

They seem to follow a greed and a controlled, almost addictive hunger that is triggered ... how and from where? Insatiable protons?

Perhaps the stronger an energy-mass, the stronger it recognizes mass not yet ready for connection and urges for a fast decay of the non-utilizing ones. So we destroy and compress ourselves then too.

P.S. String theory fails for me a bit on the shape. It has predetermined breaking points that break any singularity.
A bit like the knack-point with flowers. The stem is only at some places good to break, in between it is thoroughly rubbery and firm.
Just not everywhere.

_______________________________________________________________

Addendum comment from the present (August 2026):

This text documents a state of my pre-university, intuitive system research.

About 2 months ago I came across "physics". Since then researching and comparing. So many terms and thought-forms. It is incredible. And the most fascinating thing is that although we speak in different languages, we humans from different perspectives nevertheless speak almost identically about things we perceive. Without knowing it consciously, we speak about physical problems and structures. So I see more and more analogies.
And also many better more pragmatic approaches that develop daily.

So here this addendum:
From today's perspective, on the eve of my studies of theoretical physics at the TU Dortmund, the former stimulus-absorption can be precisely specified:
My former assumption that neutrons are displaced as "translators" and electrons transform into protons was the metaphorical attempt to describe the phenomenon of entropy minimization and symmetry breaking.
What I observed pheno-menologically as the "addictive hunger of protons", I deconstruct today as the striving of quantum systems for the energetic ground state.

The analogy between human communication and atomic binding energy sketched in this text is the actual foundation on which my free open-source project "Universal-Matrix" builds today.