Matter and non-matter
Matter and non-matter
362 days, 15 hours ago
Thought: For non-matter to exert a sustained effect, it requires an environment—a surrounding context that maintains balance, ensuring the force field operates in a controlled manner rather than breaking out of bounds. As long as the matter exists within a harmonious environment, the force of the non-matter continues to develop.
Throughout the process of the matter’s disintegration, the non-matter can gradually acclimatize, adapt, and transform.Can it draw upon other energy fields to advance toward a state of pure energy specific to its own nature (determined by prior connections)?
Perhaps the fertilization of the egg cell is an energetic process that creates and develops a connection—a bond—involving a kind of non-matter.
There is slow cell growth, and the non-matter has the potential to exist across cells, distributing its energy concentration among many of them.
This non-matter is held in place by the particles and elements surrounding the nucleus.
Do they like each other?
Do they need each other?
I believe there are affinities between particles, just as there is an urge for symmetry—something I understand very well.
Since the non-matter would initially be "invited" to stay by the strength of just two cells—following my line of reasoning—its concentration density would need to be highly balanced. (Where are the magnets hidden?
Where does the attraction come from? Is it just movement? Particles that can never be still? ADHD particles? <- I suppose that would be me???)
And with every subsequent cell division, something must be passed on within the cell that the non-matter likes. Perhaps it is a code: a password like 00101 011 00.
If not every piece of matter had a corresponding non-matter with which it shared an affinity, it would simply be matter destined for total decay.
Decay always implies transformation and the possibility of becoming something entirely new. For in this way, it would combine as new energy to evolve, eventually forming a mass "strong enough"—with a dense region of space—to incorporate a tiny unit and grow enduringly alongside it.
A lot happens in that dense space. What exactly goes on in there?
Is the dense space between electrons and protons composed in the same way as the space between atoms? And is it the same as, or similar to, the vast space of the universe?
What is the difference between the "universe" and the "cosmos"?
Does non-matter dislike inorganic things because they cannot undergo cell division?
_____________________________________________________________________
Addendum from today's perspective (July 2026):
Rereading this text, I notice the missing intermediate steps in my logic at the time.
From a physical standpoint, there appears to be a contradiction:
I compare organic cell division (biology) with the forces inside an atom (inorganics) and wonder if non-matter dislikes inorganic things.
Today, I separate these layers more precisely: Quantum physics does not distinguish between the animate and the inanimate.
An electron in a stone behaves exactly like an electron in a biological egg cell.
Attraction is not triggered by biological information (DNA), but by the fundamental charges of the particles themselves.
The restless dynamics of particles—the impossibility of standing still—is not a biological process, but the fundamental quantum fluctuation of the vacuum (Heisenberg's uncertainty principle).
Biology merely exploits this physical "density-space"; it does not create it. It is precisely this rigorous vocabulary and mathematical craftsmanship that I am now learning at the TU Dortmund.
Previous